The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SKIL · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MLGO · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NVVE | EXFY | SKIL | MLGO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 37 (highest) | 30 | — | — |
| Pricing power | 58 | 94 | 98 (highest) | 25 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 31 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 670% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $6.7M | $159M | $55.9M | $183M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2022 |