The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NXB · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NXB | PVH | LBRA | BWA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 (highest) | 34 | 50 (highest) | 45 |
| Pricing power | 27 | 92 (highest) | 30 | 31 |
| Returns on capital | — | 18 | 0 | 33 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 12 | 73 (highest) | 46 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 40 | 44 (highest) | 38 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 82% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $44.2M | Not reported | Not reported | $12.1B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |