The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GDRX · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
KWIK · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NXTT | GDRX | ZIP | KWIK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 45 | 63 (highest) | 10 | 57 |
| Pricing power | 67 | — | 100 (highest) | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 12 | 0 | 41 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 37 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 78 (highest) | 44 | 24 |
| No price data | 12% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 259% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3M | $1.1B | $278M | $3.1M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |