The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OCLN · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OZVN · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OCLN | DSGR | COOK | OZVN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 35 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 74 (highest) | 45 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 10 | 46 | 62 (highest) | 0 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 28 | 78 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 60 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 224% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $7.8M | $1.6B | $9.1B | — |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |