The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ODRS · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
TRUG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ODRS | TRUG | CAVA | REBN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 22 | 80 (highest) | 65 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 89 | 11 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 33 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 47 (highest) | 40 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 4899% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $1.1M | $7.4B | $10.8M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |