The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

OFAL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DOGP · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ECXJ · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

XOS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureOFALDOGPECXJXOS
Moat Score (0–100)32 (highest)32 (highest)32 (highest)32 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend202060 (highest)
Pricing power2970 (highest)70 (highest)0
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)282855 (highest)
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)4244 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$2.9M$1.2M$138M$23M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025