The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

OGE · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RENX · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SO · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

YORW · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureOGERENXSOYORW
Moat Score (0–100)3233 (highest)33 (highest)32
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend247091 (highest)76
Pricing power86 (highest)9
Returns on capital50112 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety228 (highest)12
Capital allocation4460 (highest)3939
79% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data117% above value if growth stopped today112% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$9.4B$1.6M$95.7B$472M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025