The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

OGE · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SO · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

OPTT · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

YORW · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureOGESOOPTTYORW
Moat Score (0–100)3233 (highest)33 (highest)32
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend2491 (highest)6376
Pricing power86 (highest)0
Returns on capital51012 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety2155 (highest)2
Capital allocation44 (highest)3944 (highest)39
97% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)146% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data102% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$10.3B$108.9B$25.7M$450M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025