The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OI · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OI | ALB | FF | CRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 36 | 55 (highest) | 10 | 48 |
| Pricing power | 28 | 29 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 25 | 63 (highest) | 39 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 0 | 28 | 50 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 35 | 43 | 5 |
| No price data | 884% above value if growth stopped today | 12% below value if growth stopped today | 23% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $13.5B | $204M | $4.7B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |