The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

OKTA · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

VIAV · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RBRK · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ATHR · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureOKTAVIAVRBRKATHR
Moat Score (0–100)56 (highest)56 (highest)56 (highest)56 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend85 (highest)255722
Pricing power989796100 (highest)
Returns on capital051 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety73552878 (highest)
Capital allocation2452 (highest)4424
No price data3010% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$24.8B$8.8B$14.4B$50.3M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2026FY2025