The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OPLN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SPWH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | OPLN | HOST | SPWH | SARO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 70 | 5 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 66 (highest) | 56 | 28 |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 0 | 82 (highest) | 19 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 58 (highest) | 28 | 0 | 22 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 64 (highest) | 60 |
| 132% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | 436% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $3.9B | $38.4M | $39M | $7.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |