The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
XIFR · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GWRS · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SLNG · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OPTT | XIFR | GWRS | SLNG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 19 | 20 (highest) | 20 (highest) | 17 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 25 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 34 |
| Pricing power | 0 | — | — | 9 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 0 | 0 | — |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | 76% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 276% above value if growth stopped today | 6287% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $139M | $934M | $230M | $88.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |