The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PRSU · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LIMX · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OPTU | PRSU | AMCX | LIMX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 | 40 (highest) | 39 | 39 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 22 | 44 (highest) | 20 | 13 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 86 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 14 | 48 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | — | 0 | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 64 (highest) | 0 | 40 | 44 |
| No price data | 479% above value if growth stopped today | 67% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $1.5B | $554M | $15.3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |