The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
STRA · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OSK | ELA | WMT | STRA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 87 | 90 (highest) | 86 | 76 |
| Pricing power | 26 | 28 | 44 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 65 | 93 (highest) | 75 | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 63 | 73 | 72 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 93 (highest) | 51 | 57 | 80 |
| 46% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 380% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 92% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $9.7B | $536M | Not reported | $1.7B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |