The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OSW · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RSI · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CLRI · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OSW | RSI | GLXZ | CLRI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 | 70 (highest) | 69 | 67 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 80 (highest) | 60 | 70 |
| Pricing power | — | 54 | 100 (highest) | 96 |
| Returns on capital | 39 | — | 97 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 77 | 100 (highest) | 13 | 78 |
| Capital allocation | 73 | 44 | 77 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | 319% above value if growth stopped today | 225% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $40.6M | $2M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |