The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RPD · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OTEX | AVNW | INOD | RPD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 (highest) | 60 | 80 | 75 |
| Pricing power | 99 | 56 | 66 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 6 | 7 | 14 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 52 | 85 | 100 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 37 | 76 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| 20% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 129% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $5.5B | $262M | $1.8B | $788M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |