The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OTTR · Utilities · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OTTR | GNE | WCN | ATO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 | 62 (highest) | 54 | 53 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 71 | 61 | 86 | 89 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 27 | 71 | 94 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 31 | 90 (highest) | 6 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 47 | 100 (highest) | 22 | 20 |
| Capital discipline | 67 | 32 | 85 (highest) | 60 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 25% below high estimate | 41% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 192% above high estimate | 80% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $3.8B | $374.9M | $43.7B | $28.7B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |