The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

OVV · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

EXE · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CLNV · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FTK · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureOVVEXECLNVFTK
Moat Score (0–100)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend25252080 (highest)
Pricing power——72 (highest)0
Returns on capital44 (highest)9—8
Balance-sheet safety3665 (highest)2846
Capital allocation3744 (highest)2444 (highest)
12% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price dataNo price data521% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$17.6BNot reported$2.4M$725M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2024FY2025