The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

OWLT · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HCSG · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ITRI · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

LFST · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureOWLTHCSGITRILFST
Moat Score (0–100)5354 (highest)54 (highest)53
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend47726985 (highest)
Pricing power67 (highest)2449
Returns on capital13 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety5578 (highest)7649
Capital allocation44416080 (highest)
No price data198% above value if growth stopped today171% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$141M$1.6B$3.8B$4.2B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025