The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OZVN · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OCLN · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OZVN | COOK | OCLN | GTEC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 | 36 (highest) | 35 | 35 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 45 | 60 (highest) | 21 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 62 (highest) | 10 | 28 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | — | 37 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 73 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 19 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 86% below high estimate |
| Market cap | — | $9.1B | $7.8M | $9.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |