The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PAMT · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PAMT | WGRX | WOR | HY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 45 | 50 (highest) | 39 | 49 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 1 | 17 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 0 | 4 | 10 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 35 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 42 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 47% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 15% below high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $286.1M | $274.5M | $2.7B | — |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |