The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PANW · Technology · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

RSSS

Score temporarily unavailable — we couldn't reach the scoring service, and we won't show a stale or guessed number.

ESE · Technology · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

TEAM · Technology · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasurePANWRSSSESETEAM
Moat Score (0–100)65 (highest)—65 (highest)65 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0—moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend75—100 (highest)70
Pricing power100 (highest)—64100 (highest)
Returns on capital7—13 (highest)—
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)—7055
Capital allocation44—79 (highest)36
3662% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data387% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$301.8BNot reported$6.5B$56.5B
Moat tierNarrow moat—Narrow moatNarrow moat
Filing dateFY2026—FY2025FY2026

Rows show "—" where a company isn't covered or its score couldn't be fetched — we don't fill gaps with guesses.