The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PARR · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PARR | RSRV | MUR | EPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 47 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 72 (highest) | 20 | 20 | 70 |
| Pricing power | — | 90 | 100 (highest) | 74 |
| Returns on capital | 36 | 4 | 7 | 53 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 53 | 73 (highest) | 47 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 29 | 52 | 64 (highest) | 11 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 7% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 44% above high estimate | 16% above high estimate | 192% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $3.8B | $31.8M | $5.3B | $132.5M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |