The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NROM · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
NRDY · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PATK | NROM | NRDY | DLTR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 23 | 78 (highest) | 52 | 39 |
| Pricing power | 26 | — | 97 (highest) | 48 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | — | 64 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 40 | 55 | 90 |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 30 | 44 | 69 (highest) |
| 10% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 163% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 68% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $2.8B | $14.9M | $102M | $23.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |