The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MPTI · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PAYC | MPTI | ROL | INTU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 91 | 92 (highest) | 92 (highest) | 90 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | — | 86 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 88 | 100 (highest) | 97 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 100 (highest) | 92 | 92 |
| Capital discipline | 89 (highest) | 80 | 80 | 63 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 30% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 634% above high estimate | 105% above high estimate | 63% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $8.0B | $285M | $18.6B | $82.7B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |