The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MPTI · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
INTU · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PAYC | MPTI | ROL | INTU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 91 | 92 (highest) | 92 (highest) | 90 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | — | 86 | — |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 88 | 100 (highest) | 97 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 100 (highest) | 92 | 94 |
| Capital allocation | 89 (highest) | 80 | 80 | 70 |
| 266% above value if growth stopped today | 493% above value if growth stopped today | 192% above value if growth stopped today | 134% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $13.9B | $230M | $16.3B | $88.6B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |