The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PED · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DD · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PED | CLF | CITR | DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 (highest) | 20 | 50 | 25 |
| Pricing power | — | 1 | 52 (highest) | 32 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 67 (highest) | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 26 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 29 | 44 (highest) |
| 58% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 14% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $57.3M | $6.8B | $94.3M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |