The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PFGC · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FET · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

GBTG · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

LYTS · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasurePFGCFETGBTGLYTS
Moat Score (0–100)3940 (highest)40 (highest)39
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend90 (highest)608576
Pricing power2515—41 (highest)
Returns on capital6008 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety1578 (highest)1311
Capital allocation60 (highest)4460 (highest)60 (highest)
130% above value if growth stopped today908% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data104% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$15.3B$886M$5.0B$729M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2026