The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NAVN · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PINS | FRSH | PATH | NAVN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 66 (highest) | 66 (highest) | 66 (highest) | 66 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 85 (highest) | 85 (highest) | 70 |
| Pricing power | 94 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 93 |
| Returns on capital | 5 (highest) | 0 | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | Not reported | $3.0B | $5.9B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |