The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BRQSF · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BELFA · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PL | RBBN | BRQSF | BELFA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 60 | — |
| Pricing power | 53 | 81 (highest) | 28 | 22 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | — | 30 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 36 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 93% below high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | Not reported | $353M | $3M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2017 | FY2025 |