The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LGL · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | POWI | ESP | EEX | LGL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 10 | 65 (highest) | 60 | 65 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 85 | 11 | 98 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 46 (highest) | 26 | 32 | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 28 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 60 (highest) | 44 | 34 |
| 209% above value if growth stopped today | 163% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 207% above value if growth stopped today | 762% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $2.5B | $170M | $996M | $41.4M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |