The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PPL · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MNTK · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NFE · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

VIVK · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasurePPLMNTKNFEVIVK
Moat Score (0–100)22 (highest)22 (highest)22 (highest)20
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend85 (highest)544250
Pricing power27 (highest)110
Returns on capital05 (highest)40
Balance-sheet safety2828 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital allocation01724 (highest)24 (highest)
224% above value if growth stopped today148% above value if growth stopped today91% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$27.2B$268M$96.6M$5.9M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025