The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PRSU · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LBRDA · Communications · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PRSU | LBRDA | ROKU | VSAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 39 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 44 | 85 (highest) | 78 | 59 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | — | 64 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 14 (highest) | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 11 |
| Capital discipline | 0 | 48 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 477% above high estimate | 55% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $1.5B | $4.3B | $21.3B | $9.5B |
| Moat tier | No moat | Shallow moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |