The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PRSU · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LUCK · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | PRSU | LUCK | VSAT | AMCX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 | 41 (highest) | 40 | 39 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 44 | 56 | 65 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 23 | 100 (highest) | 86 |
| Returns on capital | 14 | 28 | 0 | 48 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 40 (highest) | 11 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 0 | 58 (highest) | 24 | 40 |
| 512% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 66% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $1.5B | $656M | $8.0B | $574M |
| Moat tier | No moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |