The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RGS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PRTS | SDOT | RGS | IPW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 22 | 57 (highest) | 40 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 52 (highest) | 0 | — | 51 |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 5 | 10 (highest) | 10 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 29 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | 26% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $558M | $13M | $72.9M | $65825 |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |