The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PSIX · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
UPS · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PSIX | UPS | TNC | PLOW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 56 | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 56 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 25 | 40 | 75 |
| Pricing power | 2 | — | 69 (highest) | 41 |
| Returns on capital | 87 | 100 (highest) | 36 | 49 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 84 (highest) | 46 | 82 | 78 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 57 | 58 (highest) | 39 |
| 287% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 5% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 74% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.1B | Not reported | $1.2B | $912M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |