The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SHAK · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PZZA · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PSMT | CDW | SHAK | PZZA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 | 66 (highest) | 66 (highest) | 65 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 66 | 75 | 75 |
| Pricing power | 18 | 23 (highest) | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 53 | 88 | 7 | 96 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 65 | 100 (highest) | 48 |
| Capital allocation | 56 | 86 (highest) | 80 | 40 |
| 372% above value if growth stopped today | 27% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 9% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $5.7B | $17.3B | Not reported | $996M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |