The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PTEN · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CJAX · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

RCON · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DSS · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasurePTENCJAXRCONDSS
Moat Score (0–100)26 (highest)26 (highest)26 (highest)26 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend60 (highest)542531
Pricing power27 (highest)19
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety02855 (highest)55 (highest)
Capital allocation44 (highest)242424
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$3.9B$50.3M$2.7M$5M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2016FY2025