The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PUBC · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RNGR · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PUBC | CE | RNGR | LUVU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 40 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 27 | 41 | 57 (highest) | 38 |
| Pricing power | 84 (highest) | 35 | — | 42 |
| Returns on capital | — | 38 | 0 | 92 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 82 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 64 (highest) | 24 | 29 |
| No price data | No price data | Around the value if growth stopped today | 76% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $2.2M | Not reported | $356M | $2.3M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |