The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PWCM · Other · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ANY · Other · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ACGP · Other · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DGXX · Other · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasurePWCMANYACGPDGXX
Moat Score (0–100)3033 (highest)33 (highest)30
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend505055 (highest)0
Pricing power18 (highest)0
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety28552878 (highest)
Capital allocation444450 (highest)44
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$16.6M$7.9MNot reported$258M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2024FY2025