The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BGMS · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PYYX | BGMS | AMRC | FET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 60 | 64 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 27 (highest) | — | 26 | 15 |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 0 | 9 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 55 | 40 | 78 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 60 (highest) | 44 |
| 190% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 15% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 641% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $85.9M | $4.9M | $1.2B | $651M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 |