The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PZZA · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OSK · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | PZZA | OSK | HON | YUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 63 | 64 (highest) | 63 | 63 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 68 | 71 (highest) | 59 | 62 |
| Pricing power | — | 26 | 54 | 90 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 96 | 65 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 48 | 63 (highest) | 42 | 7 |
| Capital discipline | 40 | 93 (highest) | 60 | 56 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 20% above high estimate | 17% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 78% above high estimate | 45% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $1.1B | $8.9B | $143.7B | $40.7B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |