The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
QMCI · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SAIC · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | QMCI | SAIC | TTAN | LAW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 74 (highest) | 63 | 56 |
| Pricing power | 78 | 23 | 93 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 45 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 40 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 73 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| 31% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 32% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $13.6M | $5.2B | $6.5B | $223M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |