The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
QMCI · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | QMCI | TBCH | NXDR | INTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 62 | 83 (highest) | 66 | 70 |
| Pricing power | 78 | 43 | 100 (highest) | 96 |
| Returns on capital | — | 74 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 42 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 31% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 38% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $13.6M | $249.0M | — | $2.4B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |