The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
QMCO · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | QMCO | GETY | ALGM | LTRX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 | 40 (highest) | 39 | 39 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 43 | 42 | 50 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 65 | 100 (highest) | 70 | 67 |
| Returns on capital | — | 13 | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 36 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 42 | 20 | 24 |
| No price data | 16% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 543% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $162M | $184M | $8.5B | $207M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |