The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FWRG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | QVCAQ | GPOX | FWRG | WKSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 0 | 70 | 80 (highest) | 55 |
| Pricing power | 58 (highest) | 14 | — | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 5 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 20 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 64 (highest) | 44 | 24 | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | 257% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $322040 | $1.7M | $750M | $3.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |