The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
USDW · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RAMP | ORCL | OSPN | USDW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 73 | 74 (highest) | 73 | 73 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 | 100 (highest) | 66 | 70 |
| Pricing power | 86 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 74 (highest) | 7 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 16 | 100 (highest) | 78 |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 80 | 94 | 44 |
| 1227% above value if growth stopped today | 185% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $2.3B | $331.2B | $566M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |