The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

RBBN · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DJT · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

WAST · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

BRQSF · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureRBBNDJTWASTBRQSF
Moat Score (0–100)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend65 (highest)433060
Pricing power817789 (highest)28
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety028 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)44 (highest)36
No price dataNo price dataNo price data93% below value if growth stopped today
Market cap$353M$2.4B$1.2M$3M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2017