The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MXC · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RCKY | MXC | KOP | SOBR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 30 | 41 | 75 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 57 (highest) | — | 32 | 43 |
| Returns on capital | 16 | 7 | 24 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 24 | 73 (highest) | 6 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 42 | 43 | 88 (highest) | 44 |
| 33% above value if growth stopped today | Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 18% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $303M | $18.7M | $977M | $1.1M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |