The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CJAX · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PTEN · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RCON | TUSK | CJAX | PTEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 25 | 35 | 54 | 60 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 27 (highest) | 14 | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 4 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | 158% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $2.7M | $132M | $50.3M | $3.9B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2016 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |