The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

RDCT · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

LBRDA · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

UNIT · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SEG · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureRDCTLBRDAUNITSEG
Moat Score (0–100)3738 (highest)38 (highest)37
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend707585 (highest)50
Pricing power0
Returns on capital042 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)28055 (highest)
Capital allocation2448 (highest)2444
No price data57% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)144% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market capNot reported$4.1B$2.5B$333M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2023FY2025FY2025FY2025